Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Whittman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 29, 1982PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Harry Lee Whittman was tried by jury and convicted of robbery, aggravated assault, and conspiracy arising out of a holdup and shooting at a Philadelphia bar. On direct appeal, the judgment of sentence was affirmed. Commonwealth v. Whitman, 252 Pa.Super. 66, 380 A.2d 1284 (1977). Allocatur was denied. Whittman then filed a petition under the Post Conviction Hearing Act (PCHA). New counsel was appointed, and an evidentiary hearing was held. When the PCHA petition was dismissed, this appeal followed.

On appeal, Whittman argues that trial counsel was ineffective (1) for refusing to allow appellant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WhitmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. TownsellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. ReedSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ElliottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. PresburySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. ElliottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API