Commonwealth v. Townsell
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
*565OPINION
PACKEL, Justice.
The significant issue in this case is whether there was ineffective appellate advocacy in that appellant’s counsel on the direct appeal did not brief or argue that the manifestly prejudicial summation by the assistant district attorney warranted a new trial. Such disregard, even as an alleged tactic, is attackable if it had no reasonable basis. The rule is well established that a course chosen by counsel must have had “some reasonable basis designed to effectuate his client’s interests.” Commonwealth ex rel. Washington v. Maroney, 427 Pa. 599, 604, 235 A.2d 349, 352…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Commonwealth v. LipscombSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. NicelySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- Commonwealth v. LarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Dean Nathan Campbell v. Donald T. Vaughn the District Attorney of the County of Delaware the Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Commonwealth v. BalodisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. ShowersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. NutterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. YochamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.