Legal Opinion

Powell v. Leicester Mills Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided July 18, 1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Equity. Suit for infringement of a patent. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, Circuit Judge.

Complainants bring suit for alleged infringement by defendants of claims 1 and 2 of letters patent of the United States No. 510,934, December 19, 1893, for “improvements in web-holder actuating mechanism for automatic knitting machines.” The alleged infringing machines used by defendants were made for and supplied to them by the Macon Knitting Company and Joseph Bennor, intervening defendants, and Complainants’ Exhibit Defendants’ Machine is one of said machines. The patent relates to improvements in that class of straight knitting machines in which the needles are…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Corning v. BurdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  3. Le Roy v. TathamSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
  4. Boyd v. Janesville Hay Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Clough v. BarkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dowagiac Mfg. Co. v. BrennanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Kentucky · 1902
  2. McDowell Mfg. Co. v. Electric Water Sterilizer Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API