Northern Trust Co. v. Thompson
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice G-ridley
delivered the opinion of the court.
As grounds for a reversal of the decree, counsel for Condict and Lucy Smith here contend, as they strenuously urged before the chancellor, (1) that complainant, as trustee, under a proper interpretation of said trust indenture of July 7, 1892, has no'power, express or implied, to execute the compromise agreement of December 16, 1925; (2) that, if such power in the trustee be lacking, a court of chancery is not justified, over the objections of adult beneficiaries of the trust, in so modifying and enlarging the terms of the trust…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hale v. HaleIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
- Curtiss v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
- Gavin v. CurtinIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Eddy v. MorganIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
- In re the Will of TullerIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sheets v. Security First Mortgage Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1937
- Northern Trust Co. v. KnoxAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- Northern Trust Company v. KnoxAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007