Legal Opinion

People v. Staples

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 3, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The contention that the prosecutor improperly commented during summation on defendant’s failure to testify was not preserved for review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Dien, 77 NY2d 885, 886). We decline to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). In any event, the contention is without merit. The prosecutor’s comment that certain testimony is "unchallenged” does not constitute a *1053comment on defendant’s failure to testify (see, People v Watson, 188 AD2d 315, Iv denied 81 NY2d 849).

By asking…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. DienNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. People v. WatsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. WeaverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. People v. TascarellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. People v. WeaverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. WEAVER, DOUGLAS A., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API