Legal Opinion

Feely v. Kane

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 5, 1929No. 27,418PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Plaintiffs appealed from an order denying their motion for a new trial.

*142The action involved the validity of the will of Sarah Begley. A jury rendered a special verdict finding that she had mental capacity to make the will. The trial was lengthy. The claim is that the case was given to the jury December 4, 1928, at 2:35 p. m. and that it deliberated until December 5, 1928, at 10:45 a. m. when at its request it was brought into court and this occurred:

Foreman: “We cannot agree.

The Court: “You.have not been out there long enough.

Foreman: “I wanted to know if you had any remarks to make to me.

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Valerius v. RichardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  2. Olesen v. NorenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  3. Smith v. Kingman & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  4. Edlund v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  5. Turner v. WitteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of BegleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. Jensvold v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API