Jenzabar, Inc. v. Long Bow Group, Inc.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1DissentBerry, J.
I respectfully dissent. The Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114(l)(a) and 1125(a)(1)(A) (2006), prohibits Long Bow Group, Inc. (Long Bow), from using the trademark of Jenzabar, Inc. (Jenzabar), in a way that is likely to confuse Internet users to believe that the Long Bow Web site is somehow connected to, or affiliated with, Jenzabar — which it is not. This confusion, suggesting a nonexisting affiliation with Jenza-bar, is crafted through a “negative” omission of an identifying Long Bow title and a “positive” singular reference to the trade name Jenzabar. The trade name Jenzabar is thus embedded…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Network Automation, Inc. v. Advanced Systems Concepts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Mobil Oil Corporation v. Pegasus Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Dr. Seuss Enterprises, L.P. v. Penguin Books Usa, Inc., a Corporation Dove Audio, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Checkpoint Systems, Inc. v. Check Point Software Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.