Legal Opinion
United States v. Neosho Construction Company, Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 31, 1979No. 77-1881PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
599 F.2d 930
26 Cont.Cas.Fed. (CCH) 83,388
The UNITED STATES of America for the Use and Benefit of
OLMSTED ELECTRIC, INC., a corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
NEOSHO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INCORPORATED and the Travelers
Indemnity Company, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 77-1881.
United States Court of Appeals,
Tenth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Nov. 14, 1978.
Decided May 31, 1979.
John L. Richeson, Ottawa, Kan. (Anderson, Byrd & Richeson, Ottawa, Kan., on brief), for plaintiff-appellee.
Larry G. Pepperdine, Topeka, Kan. (Fisher, Patterson, Sayler & Smith, Topeka, Kan., and David H. Heilman, Council Grove,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States of America for the Use of Industrial Lumber Company, Inc. v. F. D. Rich Co., Inc., and Transamerica Insurance Co., a Corporation, United States of America for the Use of Industrial Lumber Company, Inc. v. Cerpac, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- T. F. Scholes, Inc., and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company v. United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Lock Joint Pipe CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
- United States ex rel. DuKane Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
- United States ex rel. General Electric Supply Corp. v. Harry Hershson Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States Ex Rel. American Builders & Contractors Supply Co. v. Bradley Construction Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997