Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. General Electric Supply Corp. v. Harry Hershson Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 6, 1943PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODDARD, District Judge.

Motion by plaintiff, General Electric Supply Corporation, for summary judgment.

The action is based on the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C.A. § 270a et seq., to recover $736 on a payment bond executed by defendant Harry Hershson Co. Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Hershson), as principal, and the defendant Standard Accident Insurance Company as surety.

Hershson was the general contractor for the construction of an addition to the Cadet Hospital and Annex at West Point, New York. Material was furnished by General Electric Supply Corporation under a contract with Nathan Schwartz, a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States ex rel. Korosh v. Otis Williams & Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1939

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. I. Burack, Inc. v. Sovereign Construction Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1972
  2. United States Ex Rel. J. A. Edwards & Co. v. Peter Reiss Construction Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1959
  3. United States Ex Rel. Clark Concrete Construction Corp. v. James Stewart Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1961
  4. United States ex rel. Olmsted Electric, Inc. v. Neosho Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. Neosho Construction Company, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API