Legal Opinion

Porras v. Castle & Cooke, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 15, 1988No. WCB 84-11249; CA A45400PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order that affirmed the portion of the referee’s order awarding her 85 percent unscheduled permanent partial disability and modified the portion of the referee’s order regarding the date she became medically stationary. The petition for judicial review was filed on August 19, 1987. The scope of review, therefore, requires us to determine if the Board order is supported by substantial evidence in the record. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200, 205, 752 P2d 312 (1988). Because the Board order is inadequate for judicial review under…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Castle & Cook, Inc. v. PorrasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API