Legal Opinion

Santora & McKay v. Mazzella

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 28, 1992PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Baer, Jr., J.), entered October 28, 1991, denying plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on an account stated, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The trial court properly denied the motion for partial summary judgment because questions of fact remain as to whether defendant disputed the correctness of the invoices sent by plaintiff. First, defendant claims that in telephone conversations with attorneys at plaintiffs office he communicated his dissatisfaction with a certain legal report prepared for him. Plaintiff has not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Diamond & Golomb v. D'ArcAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Santora & McKay v. MazzellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Kaye v. L.B. Russell Chemicals, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Arrow Employment Agency, Inc. v. David Rosen Bakery SuppliesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Ruskin, Moscou, Evans & Faltischek, P. C. v. BealAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Farley v. Promovision Video Displays Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API