Legal Opinion
Diamond & Golomb v. D'Arc
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 10, 1988PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Respondent, a professional corporation of attorneys licensed to practice in New York State, commenced this action against appellant to recover disbursements and fees for services rendered "over a period of time up to April 29, 1982.” The Supreme Court granted summary judgment on the second and third causes of action for an account stated, finding that appellant had received and retained bills from respondent "without objection within a reasonable time”. The court found appellant’s averments insufficient to defeat the motion for summary judgment.
In his affidavit, appellant maintained that he…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sandvoss v. DunkelbergerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Breed v. Aberdeen Petroleum Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
3Cited by9 opinions
- Shea & Gould v. BurrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Yannelli, Zevin & Civardi v. SakolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Santora & McKay v. MazzellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Scheichet & Davis, P. C. v. SteingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Marcus Borg Rosenberg & Diamond v. Gilbert, Segall & Young, L. L. P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.