Legal Opinion
Heinemann v. Howe & Rusling
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided January 2, 2008No. 02-CV-6211LPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Marion Heinemann, commenced this action against her former employer, Howe & Rusling, Inc. (“H & R”), and several individual defendants, alleging claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., the Equal Pay Act (“EPA”), 29 U.S.C. § 206(d), the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., and the New York Human Rights Law (“HRL”), N.Y. Exec. L. § 296 et seq. 1 Defendants have moved for…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Frank v. Lawrence Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Anthony George Bell v. Weinreb Management LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2026
- Lareau v. Northwestern Medical CenterDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2019