Legal Opinion
Smith v. Scott
New Rochelle City Court
Decided January 13, 1948PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFasso, J.
The tenant herein has appeared specially, has challenged the sufficiency of the petition and precept, and has moved for an order for a dismissal of the petition. The tenant is, of course, limited, at this stage of the proceeding to such defects as may appear on the face of the petition. The tenant relies upon four grounds in support of his position.
First, the tenant contends that the landlord has improperly and insufficiently alleged that she comes within the exceptions to the National Housing and Rent Act of 1947 (U. S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix, § 1881 et seq. [Public Law 129, 80th Cong,, 1st…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ellenbogen v. CaldwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
- Boland v. BeebeCity of New York Municipal Court · 1946
- Monaghan v. Kane, New York County Courts1946
- Hollis v. GelbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
- Lutzker v. KingNew Rochelle City Court · 1947
3Cited by5 opinions
- Margolies v. LawrenceCivil Court of the City of New York · 1971
- Hanover Estates, lnc. v. FinkelsteinCity of New York Municipal Court · 1949
- Lutzker v. KingNew Rochelle City Court · 1947
- Besmanoff v. AllenLong Beach City Court · 1987
- Trivell v. ArnoldCivil Court of the City of New York · 1963