Legal Opinion

Margolies v. Lawrence

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided August 31, 1971PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIrving Younger, J.

Once again, a point of practice which landlord-tenant lawyers seem to take for granted turns out, upon examination, to be obscure in origin and troublesome in application.

Petitioner here is the prime tenant of an apartment in New York City. Bespondent is his subtenant. The tenancy was month-to-month. Wishing to recover possession of the apartment, petitioner served upon respondent a one-month notice to quit, and, when respondent failed to vacate, commenced this holdover proceeding. The petition, on the usual printed form, recites that respondent‘ ‘ was served in the manner provided for by law…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Witherbee, Sherman & Co. v. WykesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  2. Smith v. ScottNew Rochelle City Court · 1948
  3. Lutzker v. KingNew Rochelle City Court · 1947

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. WashingtonCivil Court of the City of New York · 1975
  2. Gazes v. Roswick (In Re Roswick)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1999
  3. Lanz v. LifrieriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Century Paramount Hotel v. Rock Land Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1971
  5. Stribula v. WienAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API