Legal Opinion · Dissent

J. P. Stevens & Co., Inc. v. Great Falls Paper Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1942No. 8,241Published

1Dissent

Mr. Justice Morris :

I dissent. The general rule relating to price quotations has no application here by reason of the particular circumstances involved. The plaintiff was advised by the defendant’s letter of .August 3, 1939, that the quotation of the price was desired as the basis for a bid for a state contract, and one of plaintiff’s salesmen who took part in the negotiations testified that he knew -that the prices submitted to the defendant were for the purpose of preparing the state bid. The plaintiff was at liberty to submit prices for defendant’s purpose or decline to do so, and if…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Leadbetter v. PriceOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Smith v. Pelton Water Wheel Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Henderson v. DanielsMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Monahan v. AllenMontana Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Colfax County v. Butler CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API