Legal Opinion
Rebosky v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 4, 2004No. 03-766CPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIRESTONE, Judge.
This military pay case comes before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for judgment upon the administrative record pursuant to Rule 56.1 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). The plaintiff is a former officer in the United States Army (the “Army” or “government”) who was involuntarily separated with an Honorable Discharge upon recommendation from an administrative Board of Inquiry (the “Board”). The plaintiff argues that his discharge was arbitrary, capricious, contrary to law or regulation, or unsupported by substantial evidence, and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Julian DIAZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- David W. Heisig v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Daniel A. Lindsay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lechliter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Matthew E. Levine v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Preferred Systems Solutions, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Santiago v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Santiago v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.