Legal Opinion
Schnell v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 1, 1948No. 134, Docket 20832PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal by the owners of a shipment of garlic carried from the port of Valparaiso in Chile, to the port of New York on the S. S. “Tubul” owned by the United States. The libel was filed in the Eastern District of New York where the libellants do business as a partnership under the firm name of H. Schnell & Co. and where three of the four partners reside. On the day of the trial the respondent was permitted to amend its answer to deny the jurisdiction of the court (admitted in the original answer) and to set up, as an additional defense, that the vessel was being…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Eastern Transportation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Horowitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- United States v. SheaSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Schooner Freeman, &C. v. BuckinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Felice Grillea v. United States and National Shipping AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Arra Ray Messenger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Felice Grillea v. United States of America and National Shipping AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Gill v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Warren v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.