Legal Opinion
In Re McMullen
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided September 3, 2010No. 09-09518PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER REGARDING APPLICABILITY OF 11 U.S.C. §§ 521(a)(6), 521(a)(2)(C), 521(d) AND 362(h)
STEPHANIW. HUMRICKHOUSE, Bankruptcy Judge.
The matter before the court is the debt- or Sandra Kaye McMullen’s motion to determine whether 11 U.S.C. §§ 521(a)(6), 521(a)(2)(C), 521(d) and 362(h) are applicable to the claim of Pentagon Federal Credit Union (“Pentagon”), secured by a 2005 Mazda, in her chapter 7 case. A hearing was held in Raleigh, North Carolina, on April 21, 2010, at which time the court gave the parties the opportunity to submit formal briefs. The debtor filed a brief, Pentagon filed a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re GregoryUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2017
- Ostrander v. Source One Financial Corp. (In re Mollison)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
- Toyota Motor Credit Corp. v. Dunn (In re Dunn)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Chau v. Capital One, N.A. (In re Chau)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2017