Southeastern Express Co. v. Nightingale
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
1. Declarations made by tlie driver of an automobile, after it liad collided with another automobile in front of a residence, to a person who, immediately upon hearing the impact of the collision, came out of the residence to the scene of the trouble, to the effect that the collision was caused by some trouble with the brakes of the car which the declarant was driving, and that he could not control his car to prevent it from hitting the other car, were, in a suit by the owner of the damaged car against the employer of the driver, to recover for damage resulting from the collision, properly…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Thornton v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Atlantic Company v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- United Motor Freight Terminal Co. v. HixonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Fetzer v. RampleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Broadnax v. NunnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958