Legal Opinion
Matter of Gardinier, Inc.
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida
Decided December 5, 1985No. Bankruptcy 85-329 to 85-333PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION TO ESTIMATE CLAIM AND OBJECTION TO MOTION BY FLORIDA CITIES
ALEXANDER L. PASKAY, Chief Judge.
THIS IS a Chapter 11 case which brings into play a seemingly apparent conflict between § 502 and § 1126 of the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rule 3018. This problem surfaced in a context of an Objection to a Claim filed by Gardinier, Inc., the Debtor, who attempts to effectuate a reorganization. The objection is addressed to a claim filed in the amount of $2,911,000.00 by the Fort Pierce Utilities Authority of the City of Fort Pierce, the Sebring Utilities Commission, and the cities of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fort Pierce Utility Authority v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Fort Pierce Utility Authority of the City of Fort Pierce v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Fort Pierce Utility Authority of the City of Fort Pierce v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bell Road Investment Co. v. M. Long Arabians (In Re M. Long Arabians)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- In Re OroscoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 1987
- In re Mangia Pizza Investments, LPUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2012
- In Re GoldsteinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- In Re River Capital Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.