Legal Opinion
In Re Goldstein
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 24, 1990No. 19-11218PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID A. SCHOLL, Bankruptcy Judge.
In order to decide whether we can confirm the Debtor’s Second Amended Plan of Reorganization (“the 3rd Plan”) at this time, we must determine whether it is appropriate for us to disregard the vote of the Debtor’s largest unsecured creditor rejecting the 3rd Plan because the Debtor’s Objection to that claim, filed during the pendency of the voting period, had not yet been resolved as of the date of the confirmation hearing. We decline the Debtor’s invitation to hold that the creditor’s failure to expressly request that its claim be allowed for purposes…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In the Matter of Pizza of Hawaii, Inc., Debtor. Pizza of Hawaii, Inc. v. Shakey's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- In Re Fred J. Szostek, Denise M. SzostekCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Jungkurth v. Eastern Financial Services, Inc. (In Re Rhoda Jungkurth)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Jungkurth v. Eastern Financial Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Bell Road Investment Co. v. M. Long Arabians (In Re M. Long Arabians)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re General Homes Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 1991
- In Re KovalchickUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- In Re Frascella Enterprises, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- In Re FRG, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- In Re Lloyd McKee Motors, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 1993