Sun Lumber Co. v. Thompson Land & Coal Co.
West Virginia Supreme Court
1DissentLovins, Judge
I do not concur in the affírmanee of the decree of the trial court for the following reasons:
I think that the action of the court in this suit gives force and effect to an inequitable principle whereby the plaintiff loses valuable property rights.
■ The opinion of the courts in other jurisdictions are varied and divergent. Some courts hold that writings, similar to that here considered, grant a mere license to remove the timber from the land for a reasonable time. Other jurisdictions take the position that such rights constitute a lease oh the land for the purpose of the timber operations.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Adkins v. HuffWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
- Craig v. HukillWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1892
- Keystone Co. v. BrooksWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
- Null v. ElliottWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
- Williams v. McCartyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.