Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Fosler v. Panoramic Design, Ltd.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 28, 2003No. 73, Sept. Term, 2001PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEldridge, J.

After becoming dissatisfied with a renovation project on their home, the petitioners, Scott and Gail Fosler, filed three actions against the respondent, Panoramic Design, Ltd., with which the Fosters had entered a “Construction Consultant Agreement.” One suit, filed in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, was this declaratory judgment action. The Foslers also filed a complaint with the Maryland Home Improvement Commission, a state government agency in the Maryland Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation. In addition, the Foslers filed a complaint with the Montgomery County…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Board of Physician Quality Assurance v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Patel v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. Lussier v. Maryland Racing CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  4. Bd. of Ed. for Dorchester Co. v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  5. Catonsville Nursing Home, Inc. v. LovemanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Maryland Aviation Administration v. NolandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. Converge Services Group, LLC v. CurranCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. Arroyo v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. Sprenger v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Prince George's County v. Ray's Used CarsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API