State v. Mertes
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
The sole issue presented here, as in the trial court, is the constitutionality of the prostitution statute under which defendant was convicted. Three specific issues are presented in this challenge. They are:
1. Is the defendant limited to challenging only the section under which she was charged or can the entire statute be attacked?
2. What is the standard of review?
3. Applying this standard, is the statute in question constitutional ?
Challenge to entire statute.
Here the defendant was charged only under sub. (1) of sec. 944.30, Stats., and not under sub. (2). Sub. (1) refers to offering or…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- State Ex Rel. Hammermill Paper Co. v. La PlanteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Johnson v. CadyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- State Ex Rel. Schopf v. SchubertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Omernik v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Moedern v. McGinnisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. EwaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- City of Minneapolis v. BuschetteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. DevallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.