State v. Austin
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARBISON, Chief Justice.
Appellant appeals from his conviction as accessory before the fact to murder in the first degree. Following the bifurcated trial procedures set out in the controlling Tennessee statutes, the jury imposed the death penalty. The trial judge concurred, finding the sentence appropriate under the facts.
Appellant was convicted of employing an escaped convict to kill one Julian Watkins, an undercover agent for the Memphis police vice squad, as the result of whose activities indictments had been returned against appellant and a number of his employees and associates in…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. DicksTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
- Houston v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
- Cozzolino v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. GrosecloseTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. BerryTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
3Cited by48 opinions
- State v. SheffieldTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. MelsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1989
- Blankenship v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- Robert Glen Coe, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Ricky Bell, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- State v. BlackTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.