Legal Opinion
Fairwood Bluffs Conservancy District v. Imel
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 3, 1970No. 1267A117PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STATEMENT OF FACTS .
Sullivan, J.
On April 22, 1963, plaintiffs, Lee B. Imel and Audra O. Imel, filed this suit against the defendants, Fair-wood Bluffs Conservancy District, and Ray Wood, Wahn Dean and Samuel Hiles to: (1) rescind and cancel an easement, (2) abate a nuisance, and (3) recover damages arising out of the surface water and sanitary drain which ran across the Imels’ real estate. Trial to the court resulted in a finding that the nuisance could not be abated. A judgment for damages was awarded in favor of the Imels in the sum of Thirty-Five Thousand Dollars.
The Imels are residents of…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Pokraka v. Lummus Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1952
- City of North Vernon v. VoeglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Martin v. Ben Davis Conservancy DistrictIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
- Burrell v. JeanIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
- City of Valparaiso v. MoffittIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State, Ind. State Highway Com'n v. SpeidelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Middelkamp v. HanewichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Biggs v. MarshIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Willsey v. HartmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
- Cox v. WinklepleckIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.