Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Jackson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 9, 2003No. 2002-B-3062PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

hPER CURIAM.

This attorney disciplinary proceeding arises from two counts of formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Audwin L. Jackson, an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Louisiana but currently suspended.

UNDERLYING FACTS

In 1995, this court suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of two years. In re: Jackson, 94-2261 (La.9/15/95), 660 So.2d 838.1 Upon completion of the suspension, respondent filed a petition for reinstatement pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 24. This court…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. In Re CaulfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  4. In Re PardueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  5. In Re QuaidSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re LindsaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  2. In re CallahanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  3. In re JacksonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
  4. In Re DowellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
  5. In re NallsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API