Legal Opinion

State v. Hogg

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 5, 1971PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.

Defendant appeals from a conviction for unlawful possession of narcotics. ORS 474.020. The only assignment of error meriting consideration is that the marihuana seized by the officers should have been suppressed.

On the evening of April 26, 1970, three Seaside police officers were sitting in a parked patrol car on a city street looking for a drunk driver reported in the general vicinity. One of the officers saw someone walking on the opposite side of the street, turned his flashlight on the person, recognized him as Martin Hogg, and called him over to ask if he had seen the drunk driver, and,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gascon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  2. State v. CorbettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  3. State v. StantonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  4. State v. FelgerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  5. State v. PidcockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API