Gascon v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
NOURSE, J. pro tem. *
Pursuant to the provisions of 999a of the Penal Code, petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition predicated upon the grounds that there was no competent evidence before the committing magistrate to establish probable cause for his being held to answer and that the respondent court erred in denying his motion, made pursuant to section 995 of the Penal Code, to set aside the information. We have concluded that the peremptory writ of prohibition should issue as prayed for.
The facts as established by the evidence taken before the committing magistrate are: About 8 p.m on January…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Badillo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. SimonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- People v. HarveyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
3Cited by56 opinions
- People v. TerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. StoutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. ZapataCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- People v. TylerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- People v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.