Brooks v. Delrymple
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Berrien (Jircuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the court,
Whipple, C. J.
From an examination of tlie record, it appears that Dalrymple commenced a suit against Brooks, in the court below, to recover damages for an alleged fraud in procuring certain property and a promissory note.
The declaration contains three counts, differing somewhat id the statement of the manner in which the fraud was perpetra ted, yet unquestionably relating to the same transaction. A brief statement of the first count will sufficiently indicate the character of the others.. It is alleged that the plaintiff was the owner of a piece of land containing about sixty…
2Cited by4 opinions
- White v. BaileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
- Gray v. WardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1916
- Parkinson v. WouldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Couch v. McKoonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912