Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Delrymple

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1848PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Berrien (Jircuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the court,

Whipple, C. J.

From an examination of tlie record, it appears that Dalrymple commenced a suit against Brooks, in the court below, to recover damages for an alleged fraud in procuring certain property and a promissory note.

The declaration contains three counts, differing somewhat id the statement of the manner in which the fraud was perpetra ted, yet unquestionably relating to the same transaction. A brief statement of the first count will sufficiently indicate the character of the others.. It is alleged that the plaintiff was the owner of a piece of land containing about sixty…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. White v. BaileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Gray v. WardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1916
  3. Parkinson v. WouldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Couch v. McKoonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API