Legal Opinion

Parkinson v. Woulds

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1900PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Livingston; Smith, J. Assumpsit by Sarah Parkinson against Thomas Woulds for breach of warranty in the sale of real estate. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Montgomery, O. J.

This action was commenced in justice’s court. The plaintiff declared verbally for breach *326of warranty deed, and damages accruing therefrom, and later amended the declaration verbally as follows:

“For obtaining money falsely and fraudulently from’ the plaintiff upon the sale of certain land in the village of Brighton, which land he warranted to defend the title, and when the said defendant had no title whatever, and was not the owner thereof, to said land, and, by reason of said warranty of title as made by the defendant on said representations, he, the said defendant, falsely…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sherwood v. LandonMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Brooks v. DelrympleMichigan Supreme Court · 1848

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Madden v. Caldwell Land Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API