Frank v. Bush
New York City Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.
The defendant interposed a demurrer to the complaint, whereupon the plaintiff, without waiting till the defendants’ time to amend had expired, moved for judgment upon the demurrer. The day before that named for the argument thereof, the defendants served an answer as an amended pleading. This they had the right to do (Robertson agt. Bennett, 1 Abb. N. C., 476). The defendants having amended within the time allowed by law for that purpose, the answer superseded the demurrer (4 How. Pr. 174; 3 Bosw., 200; 5 Duer, 654; 30 How. Pr., 1). So that there was no demurrer upon the record at the time…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Burrall v. MooreThe Superior Court of New York City · 1856
- Robertson v. BennettThe Superior Court of New York City · 1877
- Seneca County Bank v. GarlinghouseNew York Supreme Court · 1849
- Sands v. CalkinsNew York Supreme Court · 1865
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fusco v. AdamCity of New York Municipal Court · 1890
- Mussinan v. HattonThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1894
- Betts v. KridellCity of New York Municipal Court · 1887
- Woolson Spice Co. v. Columbia Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1920
- Barnes v. GibbonsCity of New York Municipal Court · 1884
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.