Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Bennett

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided January 15, 1877PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpeir, J.

Motion that the plaintiff’s attorney accept an amended answer after the service upon him of a demurrer to the complaint, under section 172 of the Code. The action is for an alleged libel. The defendant served the plaintiff with a demurrer to the complaint. Eleven days after the service, the defendant served the plaintiff with an answer withdrawing his demurrer. The plaintiff returned the answer, claiming that he had noticed the case for argument on the demurrer. Defendant claims that the demurrer is a pleading, and that he had the right to amend any time before the expiration of twenty days.…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Frank v. BushNew York City Court · 1882
  2. Betts v. KridellCity of New York Municipal Court · 1887
  3. People v. WhitwellNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1882
  4. Barnes v. GibbonsCity of New York Municipal Court · 1884
  5. Wise v. GessnerNew York Supreme Court · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API