Legal Opinion
United States v. Baldev R. Bhutani and Alra Laboratories, Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 12, 2001No. 00-1523, 00-2679PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUER, Circuit Judge.
A jury found defendants Baldev Raj Bhutani, Neelam Bhutani, and ALRA Laboratories, Inc. guilty of various violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”), 21 U.S.C. § 301 et seq. The defendants moved for a new trial, which the district court granted, finding that the government violated Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). The government appealed, and in United States v. Bhutani, 175 F.3d 572 (7th Cir.1999) we reversed and remanded the case for sentencing. On remand, the defendants again moved for a new trial, which the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Barrett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. LacherSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- United States of America, Cross-Appellee v. John CanovaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Moshe MilsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Holk v. Snapple Beverage Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Michael Spano, Sr., Defendants-Appellants/cross-Appellees, and Bonnie LagiglioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.