Tacke v. Wynia

This is an appeal from a Twentieth Judicial District Court, Lake County bench trial judgment in a consolidated case regarding easements. We affirm.

There are three issues before the Court:

1. Did the District Court err in concluding that Wynias’ use of the easement across Ekmans’ and Kellenberger’s property was permissive?

2. Did the District Court err in failing to conclude that Tacke’s easement across Wynias’ property was extinguished when Tacke’s predecessor sold Lots 18 and 19 to Ekmans?

3. Did the District Court err when it located Tacke’s easement across the Wynias’ property on the “trailer…