Legal Opinion
Johnson v. State
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided June 25, 1996No. 78800PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BENTON, Judge.
At the request of the prosecuting attorney, the Buchanan County circuit court issued and enforced an investigative subpoena under § 56.085 RSMo 1994. 1 Kent Johnson appeals, attacking the subpoena’s execution and constitutionality. Because the validity of a statute is involved, the court of appeals transferred the case to this Court. Mo. Const. Art. V, § 3. Affirmed.
I
On March 7, 1995, the Buchanan County prosecuting attorney requested a subpoena duces tecum under § 56.085 as part of a criminal investigation. The circuit judge issued the subpoena, directing “Christie’s, 3115 N.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Donovan v. Lone Steer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
- Oman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. SommersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- State v. ClampittMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. EisenhouerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.