Hall v. Town of Kittery
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
GLASSMAN, Justice.
Defendants Town of Kittery and Steven Furbish appeal from judgments of the Superior Court (York County) holding them responsible for personal injuries sustained by plaintiffs C. Leslie Hall and Marion B. Hall. Defendants argue on appeal that the Superior Court (Lipez, J.) ruled erroneously that plaintiffs had substantially complied with the 180-day notice requirement for the claim against a government entity or employee imposed by 14 M.R.S.A. § 8107 *663(1980 & Supp.1988). Because we find no such substantial compliance, we vacate the judgment.
I
The relevant facts may be briefly…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Darling v. Augusta Mental Health InstituteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
- Faucher v. City of AuburnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- Erickson v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Robinson v. Washington CountySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pepperman v. BarrettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- Bruno v. City of LewistonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
- Taylor v. Town of OronoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
- Palm v. SISTERS OF CHARITY HEALTH, SYSTEMSDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2008
- Hall v. Town of KitterySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989