Pepperman v. Barrett

ROBERTS, Justice.

Edward Barrett, Daniel Perkins and Barry Allen, employees of the Town of Rangeley, appeal from the denial of their motion for a summary judgment by the Superior Court (Franklin County, Chandler, /.). They argue that they are entitled to immunity pursuant to the Maine Tort Claims Act, 14 M.R.S.A. § 8111 (Supp.1994), that their activities were authorized by 30-A M.R.S.A. § 4452 (Pamph. 1994), and that Walter Pepperman’s claims are barred because he failed to provide notice as required by the Maine Tort Claims Act, 14 M.R.S.A. § 8107 (1980 & Supp.1994). Because we agree that…