Legal Opinion

Israel Zapata v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided October 8, 2014No. 04-13-00780-CRPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by:

LUZ ELENA D. CHAPA, Justice.

A jury convicted Israel Zapata of aggravated robbery. On appeal, he argues: (1) the trial court erred by denying his request to instruct the jury on the lesser-included offense of aggravated assault; (2) the trial court erred by denying his request for a spoliation instruction; and (3) the evidence is legally insufficient to support the trial court’s assessment of his appointed attorney’s fees as costs. We modify the trial court’s judgment to delete the assessment of attorney’s fees against Zapata and affirm the judgment as modified.

Background

One…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Rousseau v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Burdick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  3. Whaley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  4. Alfonso Carlos Tamez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015
  5. Amber Jean Long v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2019

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API