Legal Opinion

Ross v. Porteous, Mitchell & Braun Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 17, 1939PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturgis, J.

In this action on the case for breach of warranty certified to the Law Court on report, the transcript of the evidence shows that on or about September 24, 1937, the plaintiff visited the defendant’s department store and purchased from a clerk in the feminine hygiene department one or more pairs of dress shields used by women to protect their garments from armpit perspiration. She asked for white “Kleinert’s Onandoff No. Four” shields and was told that they were not carrying that any longer in stock. The clerk then showed her a shield saying that “this new kind, recently marketed, was taking…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Weiner v. D. A. Schulte, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. Ireland v. Louis K. Liggett Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  3. Flynn v. Bedell Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  4. Keenan v. Cherry WebbSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1925
  5. Bradt v. HollawayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Worley v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Brown v. Globe Laboratories, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Ringstad v. I. Magnin & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Bennett v. Pilot Products Co., Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Hanrahan v. Walgreen CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API