Legal Opinion

(PC) Hearne v. Farhat

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 22, 2021No. 2:20-cv-00557Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JOHN HEARNE, No. 2:20-cv-0557 JAM DB P 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER 13 ALEX FARHAT, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 17 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims he was purposely transferred to a prison where he had 18 documented enemies where he was attacked and injured. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s 19 second amended complaint for screening (ECF No. 35). For the reasons set forth below, the court 20 will give plaintiff…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  4. Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. Johnson v. DuffyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API