Legal Opinion

Conwell v. Hays

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1927No. C. C. 389-391PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hatcher, President:

Vance Hays and Joe Coellis, defendants, respectively, in the above.suits, are taxi drivers who have each secured from the State Road Commission of West Virginia certificates of convenience, authorizing the operation of automobiles for hire. In compliance with the requirements of Class H, Sec. 82, Ch. 17, Acts of the West Virginia Legislature, Regular Session, 1925, each of the above defendants filed with the Commission a liability insurance policy, issued by the defendant United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company.- Each of the above suits was instituted to recover damages…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shelton & Luck v. SydnorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  2. O'Neal v. Pocahontas Transportation Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lusk v. LuskWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Piper v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  3. Davis v. RobertsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Young v. BarneyUtah Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Cuellar v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API