Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Hagan

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 9, 1915PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Daviess Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Nunn

Affirming.

*408This is a controversy over 26 acres of land situated on the boundary line of Henderson and Daviess counties. As tried out in the court below the issue was solely between the devisees of Missouri Cummins on the one side and the heirs of E. W. Murphy on the other.

The Cummins were in possession and the Murphys sued in ejectment to dispossess them. The title of each is based upon adverse possession. The suit commenced in the Daviess Circuit Court by the appellee Hagan against Mrs. Missouri Cummins. He sued to compel her to convey to him a certain tract…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Louisville & N. R. R. v. Simrall's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  2. Henry Clay Fire Insurance v. BarkleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  3. Rosenberg v. DahlCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  4. Frye v. McKinleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Codell Construction Co. v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  2. Davidson v. RatliffeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API