Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Groh v. Westin Operator, LLC
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided March 28, 2013No. Court of Appeals No. 11CA0363Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
JUDGE FURMAN
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
156 I respectfully dissent from that portion of the majority's opinion that reverses the district court's grant of summary judgment. In all other respects, I concur.
57 The majority holds that a hotel has a duty to act reasonably in evicting a guest. I take no issue with such a premise. In adopting Groh's arguments, however, the majority concludes that it is proper to reverse summary judgment in this case because the Wes-tin acted unreasonably during the eviction, which was, therefore, a contributory cause of Groh's injuries. In my opinion,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. KeenanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- University of Denver v. WhitlockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Lombard v. Colorado Outdoor Education Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- Mostert v. CBL & AssociatesWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
- Casebolt ex rel. Casebolt v. CowanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.