Legal Opinion
2-J CORP. v. Tice
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 7, 1996No. 2:96-mc-00090PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOYNER, District Judge.
This diversity 1 action arises out of the following facts, taken in Plaintiff 2-J Corporation (2-J), trading as Dr.. Feelgoode’s, fa vor. In 1987, Defendant Jewell Building Systems (JBS) sold a “building in a box” through an agent to 2-J. Defendant William E. Tice III, trading as Tice Construction Company (Tice), was that agent and was also the entity that erected the building. Third parties installed the heating, electricity and plumbing. 2-J used the building as a warehouse, showroom and sales area. In 1994, the roof and exterior walls of the building…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- J.F. Feeser, Inc. v. Serv-A-Portion, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- 33 Ucc rep.serv.2d 791, prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 15,107 2-J Corporation T/a Dr. Feelgoode's v. William E. Tice, Iii, T/a Tice Construction Company Jewell Building Systems, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- 2-J Corporation v. TiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997