Legal Opinion
Steel Los III, LP v. Power Authority
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 15, 2008PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Thomas P. Phelan, J.
In this special proceeding challenging the condemnation of certain property, petitioners seek judgment declaring that (i) the condemnation was unauthorized or excessive or both; (ii) the condemnation is null and void; and (iii) the condemnation is invalid because the Eminent Domain Procedure Law is unconstitutional on its face and, alternatively, because respondent’s application of EDPL 206 to petitioners unconstitutionally deprived petitioners of their property. Lastly, petitioners seek restoration of all right, title and interest in their property as…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Jackson v. New York State Urban Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. . Adirondack Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Adirondack Railway Co. v. New York StateSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Waldo's, Inc. v. Village of Johnson CityNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Syracuse University v. Project Orange Associates Services Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010