Legal Opinion

Houghton v. The Mary K. Campbell

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 31, 1889PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Admiralty.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The application of payments of moneys received by a creditor, when not determined by the act of the parties at the time, should be made by the court in accordance with the common intention of the parties, where there is evidence, either express or by fair implication, of what the common intention was. This intention, when ascertainable, is controlling. I am satisfied from the correspondence and the evidence in this case that the libelants, the agents of the Mary K. Campbell in this port, in making their advances to the owners, made them upon the faith of the moneys to be collected by them on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. One Hundred & Fifty-One Tons of CoalU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1859
  2. The J. F. SpencerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1871

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. West Kentucky Coal Co. v. DillmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  2. The Sophia JohnsonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1916
  3. Union Trust v. Nichols, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API