McGalliard v. Liberty Leasing Co. of Alaska, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1DissentBoochever, Justice
Although I can agree with a great deal of the majority opinion, I dissent for the reason that I believe the case should be remanded to the trial court for a determination of factual issues as to whether the lease is subject to the usury law. I also would place a different emphasis on some of the considerations set forth by the majority in determining those issues.
This case presents a difficult question concerning the applicability of Alaska’s usury statute, AS 45.45.010 et seq. to a relatively modern commercial leasing agreement. The fundamental question here is whether the agreement between…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hare v. General Contract Purchase Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
- Hafer v. SpaethWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Sloan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
- State v. J. C. Penney Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Peco, Inc. v. Hartbauer Tool & Die Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.