Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Whittier v. Safford

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1923No. 2740PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT.

BRATTON, J.

Appellant is the duly qualified and acting traveling auditor, having been appointed to such position by the Governor under the provisions of chapter 186, Laws 1921. As such, he presented to the appellee, who is the duly elected, qualified, and acting state auditor a voucher in the sum of $6.50, covering his expenditure of money for one day’s lodging and subsistence while absent from his home upon official business. The appellee refused payment of such account, and this suit was instituted in the court below to compel, by mandamus, the payment thereof. An…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  2. Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  3. State ex rel. Lucero v. MarronNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1912
  4. State ex rel. Delgado v. SargentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hannah v. ArmijoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
  2. State Ex Rel. Holmes v. State Board of FinanceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Crane v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  4. State v. GomezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
  5. State v. MillerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1927

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API